Mildener v. United Industrial Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mildener v. United Industrial Bank

10 A.D.2d 976, 202 N.Y.S.2d 249, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10037

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 16, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 976 (Mildener v. United Industrial Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mildener v. United Industrial Bank, 10 A.D.2d 976, 202 N.Y.S.2d 249, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10037 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

-In an action by a depositor against his bank for damages caused by the bank’s alleged negligent and willful refusal to honor certain checks drawn by him, plaintiff appeals from (1) an order, dated March 23, 1959, which denied his motion to vacate defendant’s demand for a bill of particulars and, on the court’s own motion, struck the case from the General Calendar; and (2) an order, dated June 30, 1959, which granted defendant’s motion to strike the case from the calendar as a preferred case, such preference having been accorded under rule 7 of the Rules of the Supreme Court, Kings County. Orders affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

-In an action by a depositor against his bank for damages caused by the bank’s alleged negligent and willful refusal to honor certain checks drawn by him, plaintiff appeals from (1) an order, dated March 23, 1959, which denied his motion to vacate defendant’s demand for a bill of particulars and, on the court’s own motion, struck the case from the General Calendar; and (2) an order, dated June 30, 1959, which granted defendant’s motion to strike the case from the calendar as a preferred case, such preference having been accorded under rule 7 of the Rules of the Supreme Court, Kings County. Orders affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 976, 202 N.Y.S.2d 249, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mildener-v-united-industrial-bank-nyappdiv-1960.