Milburn & Semmes v. Watson Realty Co.

119 F.2d 784, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3857
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMay 7, 1941
DocketNo. 8830
StatusPublished

This text of 119 F.2d 784 (Milburn & Semmes v. Watson Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Milburn & Semmes v. Watson Realty Co., 119 F.2d 784, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3857 (6th Cir. 1941).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and the briefs and oral arguments of counsel; and it appearing to the court that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in disallowing appellant’s application for compensation, Woods v. City National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, 312 U.S. 262, 61 S.Ct. 493, 85 L.Ed. -, decided February 3, 1941; Dickinson Industrial Site v. Cowan, 309 U.S. 382, 389, 60 S.Ct. 595, 84 L.Ed. 819; Butzel v. Webster Apartments Co., 6 Cir., 112 F.2d 362, 366, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dickinson Industrial Site, Inc. v. Cowan
309 U.S. 382 (Supreme Court, 1940)
Woods v. City Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago
312 U.S. 262 (Supreme Court, 1941)
Butzel v. Webster Apartments Co.
112 F.2d 362 (Sixth Circuit, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 F.2d 784, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milburn-semmes-v-watson-realty-co-ca6-1941.