Milburn & Semmes v. Watson Realty Co.

Sixth Circuit

Milburn & Semmes v. Watson Realty Co.

119 F.2d 784, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3857

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided May 7, 1941·No. No. 8830·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and the briefs and oral arguments of counsel; and it appearing to the court that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in disallowing appellant’s application for compensation, Woods v. City National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, 312 U.S. 262, 61 S.Ct. 493, 85 L.Ed. -, decided February 3, 1941; Dickinson Industrial Site v. Cowan, 309 U.S. 382, 389, 60 S.Ct. 595, 84 L.Ed. 819; Butzel v. Webster Apartments Co., 6 Cir., 112 F.2d 362, 366, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record and the briefs and oral arguments of counsel; and it appearing to the court that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in disallowing appellant’s application for compensation, Woods v. City National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, 312 U.S. 262, 61 S.Ct. 493, 85 L.Ed. -, decided February 3, 1941; Dickinson Industrial Site v. Cowan, 309 U.S. 382, 389, 60 S.Ct. 595, 84 L.Ed. 819; Butzel v. Webster Apartments Co., 6 Cir., 112 F.2d 362, 366, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order appealed from is affirmed.

Milburn & Semmes v. Watson Realty Co., 119 F.2d 784, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3857 (6th Cir. 1941).

Pincite

119 F.2d 784 (Milburn & Semmes v. Watson Realty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related