Milburn & Semmes v. Watson Realty Co.
This text of 119 F.2d 784 (Milburn & Semmes v. Watson Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case came on to be heard upon the record and the briefs and oral arguments of counsel; and it appearing to the court that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in disallowing appellant’s application for compensation, Woods v. City National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago, 312 U.S. 262, 61 S.Ct. 493, 85 L.Ed. -, decided February 3, 1941; Dickinson Industrial Site v. Cowan, 309 U.S. 382, 389, 60 S.Ct. 595, 84 L.Ed. 819; Butzel v. Webster Apartments Co., 6 Cir., 112 F.2d 362, 366, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
119 F.2d 784, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 3857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milburn-semmes-v-watson-realty-co-ca6-1941.