Milander v. Department of Water & Sewers of Hialeah

456 So. 2d 588, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2109, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15311
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 2, 1984·No. No. 84-300·Published

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

The appellee city advertised for bids for the sale of a parcel of realty. The appellant Milander submitted the high bid, but the city rejected them all and did not sell the property to anyone. In entering judgment on the pleadings, the trial court correctly held that, since the bids constituted no more than offers to the city, none of which, although it had requested their submission, it was under a legal obligation to accept, Meekins-Bamman Prestress, Inc. v. Better Construction, Inc., 408 So.2d 1071 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); City of Homestead v. Raney Construction, Inc., 357 So.2d 749 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); see Schloesser v. Dill, 383 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), Milander had acquired no enforceable rights. Compare, e.g., Adolpus v. Baskin, 95 Fla. 603, 116 So. 225 (1928) (when contract subject to competitive bidding is awarded, most favorable bid may not ordinarily be disregarded); Marriott Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County, 383 So.2d 662 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), and cases cited (same).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Milander v. Department of Water & Sewers of Hialeah, 456 So. 2d 588, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2109, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15311 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

456 So. 2d 588 (Milander v. Department of Water & Sewers of Hialeah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Homestead v. RANEY CONST., INC.
357 So. 2d 749 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Marriott Corp. v. Metropolitan Dade County
383 So. 2d 662 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Schloesser v. Dill
383 So. 2d 1129 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Meekins-Bamman Prestress, Inc. v. BETTER CONST., INC.
408 So. 2d 1071 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Adolphus v. Baskin
116 So. 225 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)