Milagro Cunningham v. State of Florida

187 So. 3d 937, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4538, 2016 WL 1129759

• Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
• Decided: March 23, 2016
• Docket: 4D14-4364
• Status: Published

Opinion

WARNER, J.

Milagro Cunningham appeals his seventy-year sentence for crimes he committed as, a juvenile. We reverse based upon Henry v. State, 175 So.3d 675 (Fla.2015), and Gridine v. State, 175 So.3d 672 (Fla.2015).

Cunningham was convicted of attempted second degree murder (count I), kidnapping a child under thirteen (count II), three counts of sexual battery on a child under twelve (counts III, IV, and V), and aggravated child abuse (count VI), for acts committed, when he was seventeen years old. The court sentenced him to fifteen years on count I, life sentences on counts II through V, and thirty years on count VI.

On appeal, we affirmed his attempted second-degree murder conviction under count I on the authority of Williams v. State, 40 So.3d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), which was then pending before-the Florida Supreme Court. Cunningham v. State, 74 So.3d 568, 569 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). As to his life sentences on counts II through V, we reversed based upon Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 82, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), which holds that the Constitution prohibits the imposition of life sentences without parole for juvenile offenders convicted of non-homicide offenses. Cunningham, 74 So.3d at 570.

The Florida Supreme Court subsequently quashed this Court’s decision affirming Cunningham’s conviction on count I and remanded for reconsideration based on its decision in Williams v. State, 123 So.3d.23 (Fla.2013). Cunningham v. State, 134 So.3d 446 (Fla.2014).. On remand, we reversed the conviction on count I and remanded for a new trial on that count, noting that we had previously ordered re-sentencing on counts II through V. Cunningham v. State, 162 So.3d 1 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014).

On remand, Cunningham entered a plea on count I and the trial court sentenced him to 30.175 years on that count. It reduced the life sentences on counts II through V to concurrent forty-year sentences. On count VI, the court ordered the thirty-year sentence to be served consecutively to the other counts, for a total sentence of 70.175 years in prison. Defense counsel- objected that the seventy-year sentence was a de facto life sentence in violation of Graham, 560 U.S. at 82, 130 S.Ct. 2011. Cunningham now appeals this sentence.

In Henry v. State, 175 So.3d 675, 679-80 (Fla.2015), our supreme court held that a juvenile non-homicide offender’s aggregate sentence, which totaled ninety years, was unconstitutional under Graham, 560 U.S. at 82, 130 S.Ct. 2011. And in Gridine v. State, 175 So.3d 672, 674-75 (Fla.2015), the court found that a seventy-year sentence for non-homicide offenses by a juvenile offender was also unconstitutional because it did not provide the defendant with a meaningful opportunity for early release based upon maturity and rehabilitation. In light of Henry and Gridine, both of which were decided after the trial court’s resentencing in the present case, Cunningham’s aggregate sentence of seventy years for non-homicide offenses committed as a juvenile is unconstitutional.

We reverse for resentencing in accordance with Henry, 175 So.3d at 680, and Horsley v. State, 160 So.3d 393, 395-96 (Fla.2015).

CIKLIN, C.J., and KLINGENSMITH, J., concur.