Milad Attalla v. Loyc Investment
This text of Milad Attalla v. Loyc Investment (Milad Attalla v. Loyc Investment) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: Milad Attalla v. Loyc Investments Ltd. Co.
Appellate case number: 01-21-00078-CV
Trial court case number: 2019-78630
Trial court: 80th District Court of Harris County
The appellant, Milad Attalla, has filed a consolidated motion for panel rehearing and en banc reconsideration. The appellee, Loyc Investments Ltd. Co., has filed a motion to strike the appellant’s consolidated motion for panel rehearing and en banc reconsideration as untimely. The panel has unanimously voted to deny the appellee’s motion to strike the appellant’s consolidated motion as untimely. Therefore, the appellee’s motion to strike is hereby DENIED. On the merits, the panel has unanimously voted to deny the appellant’s motion for panel rehearing, and the en banc court has unanimously voted to deny the appellant’s motion for en banc reconsideration. Accordingly, the appellant’s consolidated motion is hereby DENIED.
Justice’s signature: /s/ Gordon Goodman Acting for the Court
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Goodman and Hightower.
En Banc Court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly, Goodman, Landau, Hightower, Countiss, Rivas-Molloy, Guerra, and Farris.
Date: September 15, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Milad Attalla v. Loyc Investment, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/milad-attalla-v-loyc-investment-texapp-2022.