Mikucki v. D'Angelo
This text of 17 Conn. Super. Ct. 266 (Mikucki v. D'Angelo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The original process in this bastardy action was returnable to and heard by a justice of the peace for Middlesex County at his office in Middletown. The plaintiff is a resident of Middletown. Defendant pleaded not guilty. Probable cause was found and defendant was bound over to this *Page 267 court. Defendant claims that the justice of the peace had no jurisdiction to hear and bind over to this court since the City of Middletown had a municipal court with exclusive jurisdiction in bastardy proceedings. Plaintiff claims that the justice of the peace has concurrent jurisdiction with the City Court.
There is no charter or special enactment granting to the City Court of Middletown exclusive jurisdiction in bastardy actions. Section 7550 of the General Statutes provides that each justice of the peace may hold court and shall have cognizance of all civil actions legally brought before him. Bastardy proceedings are civil actions. Copes v. Malacarne,
The jurisdiction conferred on municipal courts by § 7579 over civil actions is concurrent with justices of the peace in cases which under the General Statutes might be brought before the latter. O'Keefe v. Atlantic Refining Co.,
The motion is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 Conn. Super. Ct. 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mikucki-v-dangelo-connsuperct-1951.