Miksan v. Rohe & Brother

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Miksan v. Rohe & Brother

160 A.D. 918, 145 N.Y.S. 1133

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 160 A.D. 918 (Miksan v. Rohe & Brother) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miksan v. Rohe & Brother, 160 A.D. 918, 145 N.Y.S. 1133 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

It appears that the appellant has already exercised every right to which it was entitled and which was secured to it by the original order for “inspection.” The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars'costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

It appears that the appellant has already exercised every right to which it was entitled and which was secured to it by the original order for “inspection.” The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars'costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 A.D. 918, 145 N.Y.S. 1133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miksan-v-rohe-brother-nyappdiv-1914.