Mikos v. Union Collieries Co.

7 A.2d 102, 136 Pa. Super. 10, 1939 Pa. Super. LEXIS 171
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 10, 1939·No. Appeal, 216·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Following the recent decisions of the Supreme Court in Adamchick v. Wyoming Valley Collieries Co., 332 Pa. 401, 3 A. 2d 377, and Harring v. Glen Alden Coal Co., 332 Pa. 410, 3 A. 2d 381, this judgment must be reversed.

A careful reading of the record fails to show any substantial evidence that the claimant suffered an accident in the course of his employment, which resulted in a disabling injury, within the rulings of those cases. See also Orlando v. Penna. R. R., 133 Pa. Superior Ct. 588, 3 A. 2d 220.

The judgment is reversed and is here entered for the defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mikos v. Union Collieries Co., 7 A.2d 102, 136 Pa. Super. 10, 1939 Pa. Super. LEXIS 171 (Pa. Ct. App. 1939).

7 A.2d 102 (Mikos v. Union Collieries Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adamchick v. Wyoming Valley Collieries Co.
3 A.2d 377 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Harring v. Glen Alden Coal Co.
3 A.2d 381 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)
Orlando v. Pennsylvania Railroad
3 A.2d 220 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)