Mikos v. Union Collieries Co.
This text of 7 A.2d 102 (Mikos v. Union Collieries Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Following the recent decisions of the Supreme Court in Adamchick v. Wyoming Valley Collieries Co., 332 Pa. 401, 3 A. 2d 377, and Harring v. Glen Alden Coal Co., 332 Pa. 410, 3 A. 2d 381, this judgment must be reversed.
A careful reading of the record fails to show any substantial evidence that the claimant suffered an accident in the course of his employment, which resulted in a disabling injury, within the rulings of those cases. See also Orlando v. Penna. R. R., 133 Pa. Superior Ct. 588, 3 A. 2d 220.
The judgment is reversed and is here entered for the defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 A.2d 102, 136 Pa. Super. 10, 1939 Pa. Super. LEXIS 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mikos-v-union-collieries-co-pasuperct-1939.