Mikos v. Feld

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mikos v. Feld

506 So. 2d 1138, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8147

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 8, 1987·No. No. 86-708·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a careful consideration of the record, the briefs, and the contentions urged by counsel at oral argument, we find the trial court did not commit error. We affirm the judgment on the authority of Mikos v. Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc., 497 So.2d 630 (Fla.1986), aff'g Mikos v. Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc., 475 So.2d 292 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

DANAHY, C.J., and FRANK and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After a careful consideration of the record, the briefs, and the contentions urged by counsel at oral argument, we find the trial court did not commit error. We affirm the judgment on the authority of Mikos v. Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc., 497 So.2d 630 (Fla.1986), aff'g Mikos v. Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc., 475 So.2d 292 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

DANAHY, C.J., and FRANK and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.

Mikos v. Feld, 506 So. 2d 1138, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8147 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

506 So. 2d 1138 (Mikos v. Feld) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related