Mikos v. Feld

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mikos v. Feld

506 So. 2d 1138, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8147

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 8, 1987

DocketNo. 86-708

StatusPublished

This text of 506 So. 2d 1138 (Mikos v. Feld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mikos v. Feld, 506 So. 2d 1138, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8147 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After a careful consideration of the record, the briefs, and the contentions urged by counsel at oral argument, we find the trial court did not commit error. We affirm the judgment on the authority of Mikos v. Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc., 497 So.2d 630 (Fla.1986), aff'g Mikos v. Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc., 475 So.2d 292 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

DANAHY, C.J., and FRANK and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After a careful consideration of the record, the briefs, and the contentions urged by counsel at oral argument, we find the trial court did not commit error. We affirm the judgment on the authority of Mikos v. Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc., 497 So.2d 630 (Fla.1986), aff'g Mikos v. Ringling Bros.-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows, Inc., 475 So.2d 292 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

DANAHY, C.J., and FRANK and SANDERLIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

506 So. 2d 1138, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 8147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mikos-v-feld-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack