Miklj v. Empire Limestone Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Miklj v. Empire Limestone Co.

175 A.D. 968

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 175 A.D. 968 (Miklj v. Empire Limestone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miklj v. Empire Limestone Co., 175 A.D. 968 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

— Plaintiff’s exceptions sustained and motion for new trial granted, with costs to the plaintiff to abide the event. Held, that the plaintiff made out a prima facie case for the jury upon the question of the negligence of the defendant’s foreman in directing the workmen to throw into the pit the block which injured plaintiff, without warning and adequately safeguarding him against injury while at work in the excavation. All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Plaintiff’s exceptions sustained and motion for new trial granted, with costs to the plaintiff to abide the event. Held, that the plaintiff made out a prima facie case for the jury upon the question of the negligence of the defendant’s foreman in directing the workmen to throw into the pit the block which injured plaintiff, without warning and adequately safeguarding him against injury while at work in the excavation. All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 A.D. 968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miklj-v-empire-limestone-co-nyappdiv-1916.