Mikkilineni v. The City of Houston

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
• Decided: February 23, 2004
• Docket: 98-20430
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-20430 Conference Calendar

M.R. MIKKILINENI,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

THE CITY OF HOUSTON; THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Occupational Safety and Health Administration; JUAN PADRON; HAROLD DARK; JOHN LAWSON; ROBIN HORNING; DENIS LLOYD; RUSSELL MAI; PHILIP BARNARD; GARY ORADAT,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CV-94-H-3552 - - - - - - - - - - February 10, 1999

Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:**

M.R. Mikkilineni, proceeding pro se, requests leave to

proceed on appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) from the dismissal of

his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6). A movant

for IFP on appeal must show that he is a pauper and that he will

present a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. See Carson v. Polley,

* This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). ** Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 98-20430 -2-

689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982). Mikkilineni has not explained

the issues that he intends to raise on appeal and thus, has not

made the required showing that he will present a nonfrivolous

issue on appeal. See Carson, 689 F.2d at 586. Accordingly, the

motion for leave to proceed on appeal IFP is DENIED.

Furthermore, Mikkilineni may not obtain an appeal of the

final judgment by appealing from the denial of a successive Fed.

R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. See Burnside v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.,

519 F.2d 1127, 1128 (5th Cir. 1975).

Mikkilineni’s appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. Mikkilineni

is warned that future frivolous appeals will invite the

imposition of sanctions. Mikkilineni should review any pending

appeals to ensure that they do not raise frivolous arguments.

IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION

WARNING ISSUED.