Mikkilineni v. The City of Houston

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 23, 2004·No. 98-20430·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-20430

Conference Calendar

M.R. MIKKILINENI, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

THE CITY OF HOUSTON; THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Occupational Safety and Health Administration; JUAN PADRON; HAROLD DARK; JOHN LAWSON; ROBIN HORNING; DENIS LLOYD; RUSSELL MAI; PHILIP BARNARD; GARY ORADAT,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CV-94-H-3552

- - - - - - - - - -

February 10, 1999

Before BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.* PER CURIAM:** M.R. Mikkilineni, proceeding pro se, requests leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis (IFP) from the dismissal of his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6). A movant for IFP on appeal must show that he is a pauper and that he will present a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. See Carson v. Polley,

*

This matter is being decided by a quorum. 28 U.S.C. § 46(d).

**

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 98-20430

-2-

689 F.2d 562, 586 (5th Cir. 1982). Mikkilineni has not explained the issues that he intends to raise on appeal and thus, has not made the required showing that he will present a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. See Carson, 689 F.2d at 586. Accordingly, the motion for leave to proceed on appeal IFP is DENIED.

Furthermore, Mikkilineni may not obtain an appeal of the final judgment by appealing from the denial of a successive Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. See Burnside v. Eastern Airlines, Inc., 519 F.2d 1127, 1128 (5th Cir. 1975).

Mikkilineni’s appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. Mikkilineni is warned that future frivolous appeals will invite the imposition of sanctions. Mikkilineni should review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise frivolous arguments.

IFP MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mikkilineni v. The City of Houston, (5th Cir. 2004).

Mikkilineni v. The City of Houston (Mikkilineni v. The City of Houston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related