Mikkilineni v. Gallitzin Borough

531 U.S. 804, 121 S. Ct. 281
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 2, 2000
DocketNo. 99-9947
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 531 U.S. 804 (Mikkilineni v. Gallitzin Borough) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mikkilineni v. Gallitzin Borough, 531 U.S. 804, 121 S. Ct. 281 (2000).

Opinion

C. A. 3d Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this • Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Stevens dissents.

See id., at 4, and cases cited therein. Reported below: 216 F. 3d 1076 judgments); 215 F. 3d 1315 (fourth and fifth judgments).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mikkilineni v. Penn National Mutual Casualty Insurance
271 F. Supp. 2d 142 (District of Columbia, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
531 U.S. 804, 121 S. Ct. 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mikkilineni-v-gallitzin-borough-scotus-2000.