Mikityanskiy v. Thermionics, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Mikityanskiy v. Thermionics, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedDecember 21, 2012

Docket2012-1406

StatusUnpublished

This text of Mikityanskiy v. Thermionics, Inc. (Mikityanskiy v. Thermionics, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mikityanskiy v. Thermionics, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

LEONID MIKITYANSKIY, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

THERMIONICS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________

2012-1406 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois in Case No. 11-CV-3006, Judge Richard Mills. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

LEONID G. MIKITYANSKIY, Law Offices of Leo Mikityanskiy, P.C., of Brooklyn, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

STEPHEN M. SCHAETZEL, McKeon, Meunier, Carlin & Curfman, LLC, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for defendant- appellee. With him on the brief was ROBIN L. GENTRY. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PROST, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 21, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI