Mikeska v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Mikeska v. United States

171 F.2d 153, 84 U.S. App. D.C. 146

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedNovember 22, 1948

DocketNo. 9708

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 171 F.2d 153 (Mikeska v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mikeska v. United States, 171 F.2d 153, 84 U.S. App. D.C. 146 (D.C. Cir. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The case must be affirmed. The only questions involved are the intention of the insured soldier and whether or not he took such steps to effectuate his intention to change the beneficiary of his policy (if he had any such intention) as reasonably might be expected under the circumstances. We find nothing in the record to cause us to disturb the decision of Judge Letts based upon his findings of fact and conclusions of law, which we therefore adopt

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The case must be affirmed. The only questions involved are the intention of the insured soldier and whether or not he took such steps to effectuate his intention to change the beneficiary of his policy (if he had any such intention) as reasonably might be expected under the circumstances. We find nothing in the record to cause us to disturb the decision of Judge Letts based upon his findings of fact and conclusions of law, which we therefore adopt

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 F.2d 153, 84 U.S. App. D.C. 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mikeska-v-united-states-cadc-1948.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack