Mikeska v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Mikeska v. United States

171 F.2d 153, 84 U.S. App. D.C. 146

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided November 22, 1948·No. No. 9708·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The case must be affirmed. The only questions involved are the intention of the insured soldier and whether or not he took such steps to effectuate his intention to change the beneficiary of his policy (if he had any such intention) as reasonably might be expected under the circumstances. We find nothing in the record to cause us to disturb the decision of Judge Letts based upon his findings of fact and conclusions of law, which we therefore adopt

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The case must be affirmed. The only questions involved are the intention of the insured soldier and whether or not he took such steps to effectuate his intention to change the beneficiary of his policy (if he had any such intention) as reasonably might be expected under the circumstances. We find nothing in the record to cause us to disturb the decision of Judge Letts based upon his findings of fact and conclusions of law, which we therefore adopt

Affirmed.

Mikeska v. United States, 171 F.2d 153, 84 U.S. App. D.C. 146 (D.C. Cir. 1948).

Pincite

171 F.2d 153 (Mikeska v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related