Mike's Novelties, Inc. v. PIV Enterprises, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided June 4, 2024·No. 1:23-cv-01309·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MIKE’S NOVELTIES, INC., Case No. 1:23-cv-01309-JLT-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT v. (ECF No. 26) PIV ENTERPRISES, INC., Defendant. On June 3, 2024, Counter Claim Plaintiff PIV Enterprises, Inc. filed a request for entry of default against Counter Claim Defendant Mikes Novelties, Inc. and Counter Claim Defendant filed an answer to the counter claim. (ECF Nos. 16, 27.) Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that the Clerk of the Court enter default “when a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). A defendant’s default does not automatically entitle the plaintiff to a court-ordered judgment. See Draper v. Coombs, 792 F.2d 915, 924-925 (9th Cir. 1986). Rather, granting or denying relief is entirely within the Court’s discretion. Id. Inasmuch as Counter Claim Defendant is defending the counter claim by filing an answer, entry of default is not warranted. Accordingly, Cross Claim Plaintiff's request for entry of default is HEREBY DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Af Dated: _June 4, 2024 __ ef UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mike's Novelties, Inc. v. PIV Enterprises, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Mike's Novelties, Inc. v. PIV Enterprises, Inc. (Mike's Novelties, Inc. v. PIV Enterprises, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robert Draper v. Davis S. Coombs
792 F.2d 915 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)