MIKE'S GARAGE DOOR COMPANY v. Dews

469 S.E.2d 855, 220 Ga. App. 648, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 1233, 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 301
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 13, 1996
DocketA96A0186
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 469 S.E.2d 855 (MIKE'S GARAGE DOOR COMPANY v. Dews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MIKE'S GARAGE DOOR COMPANY v. Dews, 469 S.E.2d 855, 220 Ga. App. 648, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 1233, 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 301 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Smith, Judge.

Henry Dews brought this action against Mike Ratterree and Mike’s Garage Door Company for damages after a garage door allegedly malfunctioned, injuring Dews. Summary judgment was granted to Mike Ratterree, and the action against Mike’s Garage Door Company proceeded to a bench trial. The trial court found for Dews in the amount of $15,000. No transcript of the proceedings below was prepared.

Mike’s Garage Door Company appeals the judgment, contending the trial court erroneously failed to consider evidence of Dews’ negli *649 gence and evidence of its affirmative defenses. These contentions cannot be determined judicially, as no transcript or statutorily authorized substitute appears in the record before us. See, e.g., Alexander v. Jones, 216 Ga. App. 360 (1), 361 (454 SE2d 539) (1995). “[T]he burden is on the party alleging error to show it affirmatively by the record. . . . [W]hen the burden is not met, the judgment complained of is assumed to be correct and must be affirmed. Where the transcript is necessary for review and appellant omits it from the record on appeal, the appellate court must assume the judgment below was correct and affirm.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Spires v. Glencastle, Inc., 208 Ga. App. 901, 902 (432 SE2d 567) (1993). Because no transcript or statutorily prescribed substitute was prepared and transmitted to this Court, we assume the judgment below was correct, and we affirm.

Decided March 13, 1996. Phillips & Messer, Arthur L. Phillips, for appellant. Mullís, Marshall, Lindley & Powell, Julius A. Powell, Jr., for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Pope, P. J., and Andrews, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dews v. Ratterree
540 S.E.2d 250 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2000)
Woodard v. Doty
511 S.E.2d 602 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1999)
Bettis v. State of Georgia
491 S.E.2d 155 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Vulcan Materials Co. v. Pritchett
489 S.E.2d 558 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Burger v. Krueger
480 S.E.2d 230 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Hosseini v. Donino
475 S.E.2d 665 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
469 S.E.2d 855, 220 Ga. App. 648, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 1233, 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mikes-garage-door-company-v-dews-gactapp-1996.