Mikell v. State

17 So. 3d 752, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10147, 2009 WL 2190439
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 24, 2009
Docket5D09-1767
StatusPublished

This text of 17 So. 3d 752 (Mikell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mikell v. State, 17 So. 3d 752, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10147, 2009 WL 2190439 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We affirm the summary denial of Appellant’s Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence, which attempts to challenge the Department of Correction’s application of certain gain-time statutes to his sentence. “[T]he defendant must seek relief on his gain time claim by pursuing his administrative remedies within the Department of Corrections.” Gaynor v. State, 831 So.2d 1246, 1247 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (citations omitted).

ORFINGER, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gaynor v. State
831 So. 2d 1246 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 So. 3d 752, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10147, 2009 WL 2190439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mikell-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.