Mikell v. State
786 So. 2d 673, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8024, 2001 WL 649593
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mikell v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 14776 →
Opinion
No error has been demonstrated either in the trial court’s ruling denying post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing or in refusing the defendant’s request for the appointment of counsel. See Williams v. State, 472 So.2d 738 (Fla.1985); Cole v. State, 758 So.2d 1289 (Fla. [674]*6743d DCA 2000), review denied, 780 So.2d 912 (Fla.2001).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mikell v. State, 786 So. 2d 673, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8024, 2001 WL 649593 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
786 So. 2d 673 (Mikell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cole v. State
758 So. 2d 1289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Williams v. State
472 So. 2d 738 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)