Mikell v. State
786 So. 2d 673, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8024, 2001 WL 649593
This text of 786 So. 2d 673 (Mikell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mikell v. State, 786 So. 2d 673, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8024, 2001 WL 649593 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
Opinion
No error has been demonstrated either in the trial court’s ruling denying post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing or in refusing the defendant’s request for the appointment of counsel. See Williams v. State, 472 So.2d 738 (Fla.1985); Cole v. State, 758 So.2d 1289 (Fla. [674]*6743d DCA 2000), review denied, 780 So.2d 912 (Fla.2001).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cole v. State
758 So. 2d 1289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Williams v. State
472 So. 2d 738 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
786 So. 2d 673, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 8024, 2001 WL 649593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mikell-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.