Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Mikell v. State

Mikell v. State

699 So. 2d 843, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11116, 1997 WL 600300
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 1, 1997
DocketNo. 95-3402
StatusPublished

This text of 699 So. 2d 843 (Mikell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mikell v. State, 699 So. 2d 843, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11116, 1997 WL 600300 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant’s conviction. Based on the record before the trial court, we hold that the court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to suppress. See Escobar v. State, 699 So.2d 984 (Fla.1997); Savage v. State, 588 So.2d 975 (Fla.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 943, 112 S.Ct. 1493, 117 L.Ed.2d 634 (1992); McNamara v. State, 357 So.2d 410 (Fla.1978). The “trial court’s decision was based on competent substantial evi-[844]*844denee.” Escobar v. State, 699 So.2d 988, 992-93 (Fla.1997).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McNamara v. State
357 So. 2d 410 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)
Escobar v. State
699 So. 2d 988 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
Escobar v. State
699 So. 2d 984 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1997)
Savage v. State
588 So. 2d 975 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
699 So. 2d 843, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11116, 1997 WL 600300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mikell-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.