Mikell v. Dixon
This text of Mikell v. Dixon (Mikell v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2025-2889 _____________________________
ANTONIO MIKELL,
Petitioner,
v.
RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections,
Respondent. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.
May 20, 2026
PER CURIAM.
DISMISSED. See Baker v. State, 878 So. 2d 1236 (Fla. 2004).
LEWIS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Antonio Mikell, pro se, Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mikell v. Dixon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mikell-v-dixon-fladistctapp-2026.