Mikel v. Mark

New York Court of Appeals

Mikel v. Mark

700 N.E.2d 315, 92 N.Y.2d 873, 677 N.Y.S.2d 776, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 2260

DecidedJuly 9, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 700 N.E.2d 315 (Mikel v. Mark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mikel v. Mark, 700 N.E.2d 315, 92 N.Y.2d 873, 677 N.Y.S.2d 776, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 2260 (N.Y. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

On the Court’s own motion, appeal, insofar as taken from the Appellate Division order dismissing the petition, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the other Appellate Division orders appealed from do not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order dismissing the petition, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the other Appellate Division orders sought to be appealed from do not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On the Court’s own motion, appeal, insofar as taken from the Appellate Division order dismissing the petition, dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the other Appellate Division orders appealed from do not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order dismissing the petition, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the other Appellate Division orders sought to be appealed from do not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

700 N.E.2d 315, 92 N.Y.2d 873, 677 N.Y.S.2d 776, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 2260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mikel-v-mark-ny-1998.