Mike v. Pete

Navajo Nation Ct. App.

Mike v. Pete

2 Navajo Rptr. 129

CourtNavajo Nation Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 16, 1979

DocketNO. A-CV-19-79

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Navajo Rptr. 129 (Mike v. Pete) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navajo Nation Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mike v. Pete, 2 Navajo Rptr. 129 (navajoctapp 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court having reviewed the Notice of Appeal filed in the above-captioned matter pursuant to 7 N.T.C. 801(b) finds:

1. The appeal is not from a final judgment or order of the District Court of the Navajo Nation as required by 7 N.T.C. 801(a) and Rule 2 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure of the Navajo Courts; and

2. The order of the Shiprock District Court filed August 16, 1979 specifically sets a further hearing for November 19, 1979; and

3. Interlocutory appeals are not permitted under the Rules of Appellate Procedure of the Navajo Nation. Thompson vs. General Electric Credit Corporation, 1 Nav.R. 234 (1977); Estate of Fulton, 1 Nav.R. 243 (1977); Todachine vs. Navajo Tribe, 1 Nav. R. 241 (1977); Howard Dana vs. Navajo Housing Authority, 1 Nav.R. 255 (1978).

THEREFORE, the appeal in the above-entitled matter filed September 17, 1979, is DISMISSED.

[130]*130Dated this 16th day of October, 1979. Jerome McCabe Acting Chief Justice of the Navajo Nation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court having reviewed the Notice of Appeal filed in the above-captioned matter pursuant to 7 N.T.C. 801(b) finds:

1. The appeal is not from a final judgment or order of the District Court of the Navajo Nation as required by 7 N.T.C. 801(a) and Rule 2 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure of the Navajo Courts; and

2. The order of the Shiprock District Court filed August 16, 1979 specifically sets a further hearing for November 19, 1979; and

3. Interlocutory appeals are not permitted under the Rules of Appellate Procedure of the Navajo Nation. Thompson vs. General Electric Credit Corporation, 1 Nav.R. 234 (1977); Estate of Fulton, 1 Nav.R. 243 (1977); Todachine vs. Navajo Tribe, 1 Nav. R. 241 (1977); Howard Dana vs. Navajo Housing Authority, 1 Nav.R. 255 (1978).

THEREFORE, the appeal in the above-entitled matter filed September 17, 1979, is DISMISSED.

[130]*130Dated this 16th day of October, 1979. Jerome McCabe Acting Chief Justice of the Navajo Nation

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Navajo Rptr. 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mike-v-pete-navajoctapp-1979.