Mike Strong v. Caliber Home Loans

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided March 24, 2021·No. 20-1871·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

No. 20-1871

Mike K. Strong

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Caliber Home Loans, Inc.; U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust; Kozeny & McCubbin, L.C., Kerry Feld, Successor Trustee

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

Submitted: March 15, 2021 Filed: March 24, 2021

[Unpublished]

Before SHEPHERD, MELLOY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Mike Strong appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his diversity action. He argues that the district court erred in dismissing his claims for breach of contract and slander of title under Nebraska law. Upon careful de novo review, see Greenman v. Jessen, 787 F.3d 882, 887 (8th Cir. 2015) (standard of review), we affirm.

We agree with the district court that Strong’s breach-of-contract claim was barred by res judicata under Nebraska law, as the claim accrued at the time of the alleged breach, and could have been litigated in his prior diversity action. See C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. Lobrano, 695 F.3d 758, 764 (8th Cir. 2012) (federal diversity judgment is given same claim-preclusive effect that state courts would give to state court judgment); Weyh v. Gottsch, 929 N.W.2d 40, 52 (Neb. 2019) (contract cause of action accrues at time of breach); Fetherkile v. Fetherkile, 907 N.W.2d 275, 286 (Neb. 2018) (elements of res judicata under Nebraska law; res judicata applies to matters which might have been litigated in prior action). Assuming Strong’s slander-of-title claim was not barred by res judicata--as the foreclosure sale of part of the property at issue was not judicially confirmed until 2019--we agree with the district court that Strong failed to state a claim. See Wilson v. Fieldgrove, 787 N.W.2d 707, 711 (Neb. 2010) (slander of title claim requires false and malicious statement, and filing notice of valid claim is not false or malicious).

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1 The Honorable Brian C. Buescher, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mike Strong v. Caliber Home Loans, (8th Cir. 2021).

Mike Strong v. Caliber Home Loans (Mike Strong v. Caliber Home Loans) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mark Greenman v. Officer Jeremiah Jessen
787 F.3d 882 (Eighth Circuit, 2015)
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. v. George Lobrano, Jr.
695 F.3d 758 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)
Weyh v. Gottsch
303 Neb. 280 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 2019)