Mike Smith D/B/A County Line Enterprises and County Line Enterprises, Inc. v. Wilbert Kalbas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 13, 2004
Docket07-03-00488-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Mike Smith D/B/A County Line Enterprises and County Line Enterprises, Inc. v. Wilbert Kalbas (Mike Smith D/B/A County Line Enterprises and County Line Enterprises, Inc. v. Wilbert Kalbas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mike Smith D/B/A County Line Enterprises and County Line Enterprises, Inc. v. Wilbert Kalbas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

NO. 07-03-0488-CV


IN THE COURT OF APPEALS



FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



AT AMARILLO



PANEL C



JANUARY 13, 2004

______________________________



MIKE SMITH D/B/A COUNTY LINE ENTERPRISES

AND COUNTY LINE ENTERPRISES, INC.



Appellant



v.



WILBERT KALBAS



Appellee

_________________________________



FROM THE 287TH DISTRICT COURT OF BAILEY COUNTY;



NO. 7683; HON. GORDON H. GREEN, PRESIDING

_______________________________



MEMORANDUM OPINION



Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

Appellant Mike Smith d/b/a County Line Enterprises and County Line Enterprises, Inc. filed a notice of appeal on November 18, 2003. According to the pertinent district clerk, appellant did not submit a written designation for the record or pay or make arrangements to pay for the record under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). (1) Nor did he file an affidavit of indigence per Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1. By letter from this Court dated December 30, 2003, we informed counsel for appellant that "unless appellant files proof with this court by January 9, 2004, that this requirement (arrangements for payment of the record) has been satisfied . . . the cause will be dismissed for want of prosecution . . . ." Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). The deadline lapsed, and the proof required was not received.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c).

Per Curiam

1. The court reporter has also indicated that appellant has yet to file a written designation for the record or pay or make arrangements to pay for the record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mike Smith D/B/A County Line Enterprises and County Line Enterprises, Inc. v. Wilbert Kalbas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mike-smith-dba-county-line-enterprises-and-county--texapp-2004.