Mike Ramos v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 29, 2022
Docket04-22-00296-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Mike Ramos v. the State of Texas (Mike Ramos v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mike Ramos v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 29, 2022

No. 04-22-00296-CR

Mike RAMOS, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2019CR7828 Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

ORDER On October 25, 2022, we abated this appeal and remanded this case to the trial court to conduct an abandonment hearing to determine the following:

(1) whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal,

(2) the reasons counsel has failed to file a brief and has failed to respond to correspondence and inquiries from this court, and

(3) whether appellant and counsel have established an attorney-client relationship and whether appellant desires for counsel to continue representing her.

We further ordered the trial court to make written findings of fact and conclusions of law on these issues, and we ordered the trial court clerk and court reporter to file in this court, no later than November 28, 2022, supplemental records. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(3). To date, this court has not received any supplemental records or any indication the trial court has conducted an abandonment hearing.

Accordingly, we order the trial court to conduct an abandonment hearing and determine the above questions by January 30, 2023. The trial court is directed to ensure effective assistance of counsel and the orderly administration of justice. If the trial court finds appellant and counsel have not established an attorney-client relationship, appellant does not desire counsel to continue representing her, or removal of counsel is necessary to protect the integrity of the judicial process or the fair and orderly administration of justice, the trial court may remove appointed counsel and appoint new appellate counsel. The trial court may also, in its discretion, receive evidence on the above issues by sworn affidavit from the appellant. The trial court shall, however, order appellant’s counsel to be present at the hearing.

We further order the trial court to make written findings of fact and conclusions of law on the above issues, and we order the trial court clerk and court reporter to file in this court, no later than March 13, 2023, (1) a supplemental clerk’s record containing the court’s written findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations addressing the above issues, and (2) a supplemental reporter’s record of the hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(3).

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 29th day of December, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mike Ramos v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mike-ramos-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.