Mike Jethro Azubike Redford v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 24, 2019·No. A20A0755·Published

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ December 05, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20A0755. MIKE JETHRO AZUBIKE REDFORD v. THE STATE.

After Mike Jethro Azubike Redford was convicted of aggravated stalking in August 2016, he filed a notice of appeal. In June 2019, the State filed a motion to dismiss the appeal based on Redford’s delay in paying costs and obtaining the transcript. Redford then filed a document titled “Motion to Dismiss Notice of Appeal.” On July 2, 2019, the trial court granted Redford’s motion and dismissed the appeal, along with dismissing the State’s motion as moot. Redford subsequently filed a “Motion to Reinstate Defendant’s Notice [of] Appeal,” asserting that the trial court misconstrued his earlier motion. The trial court denied the motion to reinstate on August 26, 2019, and Redford filed a notice of appeal on September 11, 2019. We, however, lack jurisdiction. A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order sought to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). Here, the trial court entered its order dismissing the appeal on July 2, but Redford did not file his notice of appeal until September 11, 71 days later. See Couch v. United Paperworkers Intl. Union, 224 Ga. App. 721, 721 (482 SE2d 704) (1997) (holding that a timely notice of appeal “is an absolute requirement”). To the extent that Redford seeks to appeal the August 26 order denying his motion to reinstate his appeal – which was, in substance, a motion for reconsideration – the motion did not extend the time to appeal the July 2 order, and the August 26 order is not appealable in its own right. See Bell v. Cohran, 244 Ga. App. 510, 510-511 (536 SE2d 187) (2000); Savage v. Newsome, 173 Ga. App. 271, 271 (326 SE2d 5) (1985); see also Planet Ins. Co. v. Ferrell, 228 Ga. App. 264, 266 (491 SE2d 471) (1997) (“[P]leadings, motions and orders are to be construed according to their substance and function and not merely as to their nomenclature[.]”). Because this appeal is untimely, it is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 12/05/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mike Jethro Azubike Redford v. State, (Ga. Ct. App. 2019).

Mike Jethro Azubike Redford v. State (Mike Jethro Azubike Redford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Planet Insurance v. Ferrell
491 S.E.2d 471 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Bell v. Cohran
536 S.E.2d 187 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2000)
Couch v. UNITED PAPERWORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION
482 S.E.2d 704 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1997)
Savage v. Newsome
326 S.E.2d 5 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)