Mike Alan Downey v. State
This text of Mike Alan Downey v. State (Mike Alan Downey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant represented himself at trial. In his first point of error, he contends he did not knowingly and voluntarily waive counsel. See Cooper v. State, 854 S.W.2d 303 (Tex. App.--Austin 1993, no pet.). The State concedes error. Accordingly, we will reverse and remand for a new trial. In light of our disposition of this point of error it is unnecessary to consider appellant's second point of error.
The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court.
Tom G. Davis, Justice
Before Justices Powers, Aboussie and Davis*
Reversed and Remanded
Filed: January 29, 1998
Do Not Publish
* Before Tom G. Davis, Judge (retired), Court of Criminal Appeals, sitting by assignment. See Tex.
Gov't Code Ann. § 74.003(b) (West 1988).
1. The law in effect at the time of the offense has since been codified without substantive change in
the Penal Code. We cite the current law for convenience.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mike Alan Downey v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mike-alan-downey-v-state-texapp-1998.