Mikale v. John Bommarito Oldsmobile-Cadillac, Inc.

341 S.W.3d 129, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 595, 2011 WL 1532019
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 19, 2011
DocketED 95296
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 341 S.W.3d 129 (Mikale v. John Bommarito Oldsmobile-Cadillac, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mikale v. John Bommarito Oldsmobile-Cadillac, Inc., 341 S.W.3d 129, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 595, 2011 WL 1532019 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant auto dealership, John Bommarito Oldsmobile-Cadillae, Inc., appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying its motion to compel the plaintiffs, Rick and Jessica Mi-kale, to arbitration. We affirm because we conclude that the dealership waived its right to enforce the arbitration provision in its agreement with the Mikales.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dandridge v. HD DIRECT, LLC
341 S.W.3d 129 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
341 S.W.3d 129, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 595, 2011 WL 1532019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mikale-v-john-bommarito-oldsmobile-cadillac-inc-moctapp-2011.