Miiguel Regalado v. Noehmi B. Guerra
Opinion
NUMBER 13-10-00526-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
MIIGUEL REGALADO, Appellant,
v.
NOEHMI B. GUERRA, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 107th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION ON REHEARING Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Memorandum Opinion On Rehearing Per Curiam
By memorandum opinion issued on June 23, 2011, this Court affirmed the
judgment in this cause. See Regalado v. Guerra, No. 13-10-00526-CV, 2011 Tex. App.
LEXIS 4748, at *1 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi June 23, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op.).
Appellant has now filed a “Motion for Rehearing and in the Alternative Motion to Dismiss
Appeal.” The motion states, in relevant part, that the order subject to appeal herein had been vacated by the trial court prior to this Court’s decision on the merits. Appellant thus
requests that we withdraw our opinion and dismiss the appeal. More than ten days have
passed since appellant filed this motion and appellee has not filed a response to the
motion. See TEX. R. APP. 10.3.
The Court, having examined and fully considered appellant’s motion, is of the
opinion that it should be granted in part and denied in part. See id. R. 42.1(a)(1). The
motion is granted insofar as we withdraw our previous opinion and judgment and we
dismiss the appeal. See id. R. 42.1(c). All other relief sought in the motion is denied.
Costs are assessed against appellant. See id. R. 42.1(d).
It is so ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 18th day of August , 2011.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miiguel Regalado v. Noehmi B. Guerra (Miiguel Regalado v. Noehmi B. Guerra) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.