Mihovilovic v. Stolz
561 So. 2d 1290, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3857, 1990 WL 71620
This text of 561 So. 2d 1290 (Mihovilovic v. Stolz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mihovilovic v. Stolz, 561 So. 2d 1290, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3857, 1990 WL 71620 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
Opinion
Upon review of appellant’s brief, the court finds that no preliminary basis for reversal has been demonstrated and that pursuant to rule 9.315(a), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, the final judgment and order herein appealed must be AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
561 So. 2d 1290, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3857, 1990 WL 71620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mihovilovic-v-stolz-fladistctapp-1990.