Miguel Vidales v. JP Morgan Chase, NA., & Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for Long Beach Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-2
This text of Miguel Vidales v. JP Morgan Chase, NA., & Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for Long Beach Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-2 (Miguel Vidales v. JP Morgan Chase, NA., & Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for Long Beach Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-2) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
MIGUEL VIDALES, ' No. 08-12-00195-CV Appellant, ' Appeal from the v. ' 210th Judicial District Court JP MORGAN CHASE, N.A. & ' DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL of El Paso County, Texas ' TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR LONG BEACH MORTGAGE ' (TC# 2012-DCV-04577) LOAN TRUST 2006-2,
Appellees.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether the appeal should
be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Finding there is no appealable order, we dismiss the appeal
for want of jurisdiction.
Appellant, Miguel Vidales, is attempting to appeal from an order denying a temporary
restraining order which was sought to temporarily abate a foreclosure sale. On June 27, 2012, the
Clerk of the Court notified Appellant that this was not an appealable order and gave notice of the
Court’s intent to dismiss for want of jurisdiction unless, within ten days of the notice, a party
responded showing grounds to continue the appeal. No response has been filed.
It is well settled that appellate courts have jurisdiction over final judgments, and such interlocutory orders as the Legislature deems appealable by statute. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.,
39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001); Ruiz v. Ruiz, 946 S.W.2d 123, 124 (Tex. App. – El Paso 1997, no
pet.). A party may appeal from an interlocutory order that grants or denies a temporary injunction
or overrules a motion to dissolve a temporary injunction. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE
ANN. § 51.014(a)(4) (West Supp. 2012). However, there is no statutory provision authorizing an
appeal from the grant or denial of a temporary restraining order. Nikolouzos v. St. Luke’s
Episcopal Hosp., 162 S.W.3d 678, 680-81 (Tex. App. – Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, no pet.).
Therefore, a temporary restraining order is generally not an appealable order. In re Tex. Natural
Res. Conservation Com’n, 85 S.W.3d 201, 205 (Tex. 2002) (citing Del Valle Indep. Sch. Dist. v.
Lopez, 845 S.W.2d 808, 809 (Tex. 1992)); In re Newton, 146 S.W.3d 648, 652-53 (Tex. 2004).
Because there is no statute permitting our review of a trial court’s order denying a temporary
restraining order, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).
GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice July 31, 2012
Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, J., and Antcliff, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Miguel Vidales v. JP Morgan Chase, NA., & Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for Long Beach Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miguel-vidales-v-jp-morgan-chase-na-deutsche-bank--texapp-2012.