Miguel Tejeda-Mata v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
This text of 665 F.2d 269 (Miguel Tejeda-Mata v. Immigration and Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Before CHOY and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges, and BARTELS, * District Judge.
Appellant petitioned for a rehearing of this case and suggested that it be reheard en banc. By order filed on February 18, 1981, a majority of the full court ordered a rehearing en banc pursuant to this court’s Rule 25, withdrawing the original three-judge panel assignment of this case.
By order filed on September 22,1981, the en banc court returned this case to the original three-judge panel on the ground that the order of February 18, 1981 had been improvidently entered.
The three-judge panel now denies appellant’s petition for rehearing and reinstates its majority opinion and dissenting opinion filed herein on August 29, 1980 and reported in 626 F.2d 721.
The mandate shall issue forthwith.
The Honorable John R. Bartels, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
665 F.2d 269, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 15308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miguel-tejeda-mata-v-immigration-and-naturalization-service-ca9-1981.