Miguel Rodriguez-Martinez v. Eric Holder, Jr.

498 F. App'x 713
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 19, 2012
Docket11-73401
StatusUnpublished

This text of 498 F. App'x 713 (Miguel Rodriguez-Martinez v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miguel Rodriguez-Martinez v. Eric Holder, Jr., 498 F. App'x 713 (9th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Miguel Rodriguez-Martinez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We deny in part, and dismiss in part, the petition for review.

Rodriguez-Martinez contends that he has a qualifying relative for purposes of cancellation of removal because he is the “de facto” parent of his United States citizen grandchildren. As Rodriguez-Martinez acknowledges, however, this court has rejected his claim, see Moreno-Morante v. Gonzales, 490 F.3d 1172, 1176-78 (9th Cir.2007), and we are not at liberty to overturn the decision of a prior panel, see United States v. Easterday, 564 F.3d 1004, 1010-11 (9th Cir.2009) (a decision by a panel of this court is binding unless it is overruled by the court en bane or by the U.S. Supreme Court).

Finally, we lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s denial of petitioner’s request for voluntary departure. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(f); Kalilu v. Mukasey, 548 F.3d 1215, 1217 n. 1 (9th Cir.2008) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED IN PART.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Easterday
564 F.3d 1004 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
Kalilu v. Mukasey
548 F.3d 1215 (Ninth Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
498 F. App'x 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miguel-rodriguez-martinez-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2012.