Miguel Radilla Esquivel v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 25, 2015·No. 03-14-00544-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-14-00544-CR

Miguel Radilla-Esquivel, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 427TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-DC-13-301688, THE HONORABLE BOB PERKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Appellant’s brief was originally due in this cause on February 20, 2015. The time for

filing the brief was extended three times on counsel’s motion, including one request that followed

an overdue brief notice sent by this Court. On June 2, 2015, in granting the third motion, this Court

ordered counsel to tender a brief on appellant’s behalf no later than June 22, 2015. We further

advised counsel that no further extensions would be granted and cautioned counsel that the failure

to file the brief by that date could result in counsel being called before this Court to show cause why

he should not be held in contempt for violating the order.

Counsel did not tender the brief for filing; counsel filed a fourth motion requesting

an additional 30-day extension. Counsel’s fourth motion for extension is denied. Counsel is ordered

to tender a brief in this cause no later than July 9, 2015. The failure to file the brief by that date will result in counsel being called before this Court to show cause why he should not be held in contempt

for violating this order, and the cause will be abated with instructions to the trial court to appoint

substitute counsel to represent appellant in this appeal.

It is so ordered on this the 25th day of June, 2015.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Bourland

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miguel Radilla Esquivel v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Miguel Radilla Esquivel v. State (Miguel Radilla Esquivel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.