Miguel Padilla v. Patrick Whalen, Warden Mr. Ellis Medical Department

21 F.3d 423, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15860, 1994 WL 83800
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 14, 1994
Docket93-7327
StatusPublished

This text of 21 F.3d 423 (Miguel Padilla v. Patrick Whalen, Warden Mr. Ellis Medical Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miguel Padilla v. Patrick Whalen, Warden Mr. Ellis Medical Department, 21 F.3d 423, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15860, 1994 WL 83800 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

21 F.3d 423
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Miguel PADILLA, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Patrick WHALEN, Warden; Mr. Ellis; Medical Department,
Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-7327.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 17, 1994.
Decided March 14, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-91-358-A)

Miguel Padilla, appellant pro se.

Dennis Edward Szybala, Asst. U.S. Atty., Alexandria, VA, for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his Bivens* action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Padilla v. Whalen, No. CA-91-358-A (E.D. Va. Oct. 19, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 F.3d 423, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15860, 1994 WL 83800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miguel-padilla-v-patrick-whalen-warden-mr-ellis-me-ca4-1994.