MIGUEL ORTIZ v. PRATT INDUSTRIES, INC.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedAugust 30, 2024
DocketA25A0146
StatusPublished

This text of MIGUEL ORTIZ v. PRATT INDUSTRIES, INC. (MIGUEL ORTIZ v. PRATT INDUSTRIES, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MIGUEL ORTIZ v. PRATT INDUSTRIES, INC., (Ga. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ August 30, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A0146. MIGUEL ORTIZ v. PRATT INDUSTRIES, INC. et al.

Miguel Ortiz filed a claim seeking workers’ compensation benefits for injuries suffered in a work-related accident that occurred while Ortiz was employed by Pratt Industries, Inc. Following a hearing, the State Board of Workers’ Compensation denied Ortiz’s claim. Ortiz appealed that decision to the Superior Court of Rockdale County, which adopted the State Board’s decision. Ortiz then filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction. An appeal from a decision of the superior court reviewing a decision of the State Board of Workers’ Compensation must be brought by application for discretionary appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); Adivari v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 221 Ga. App. 279, 279 (471 SE2d 59) (1996) (to obtain review of superior court order dismissing claimant’s appeal from a decision of the State Board of Workers’ Compensation, claimant was required to file an application for discretionary appeal). And where a discretionary application is required, failure to comply with that requirement deprives this Court of jurisdiction. See Hair Restoration Specialists v. State of Ga., 360 Ga. App. 901, 903 (862 SE2d 564) (2021). Accordingly, because Ortiz failed to follow the proper appellate procedure, his appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Adivari, 221 Ga. App. at 279.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 08/30/2024 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adivari v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
471 S.E.2d 59 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
MIGUEL ORTIZ v. PRATT INDUSTRIES, INC., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miguel-ortiz-v-pratt-industries-inc-gactapp-2024.