Miguel Hidrogo Cardiel v. State

Opinion

N>'frW\05 -CP $t Jl/h&E ^W~& Uo~ty^0M 2,01TtfY)\QET Dtl\Aih CJluj LmaaP O^AM 6^ -AaJU^Y A

TamJT tJuLAliatUMj-£'lu/U;UAttle/Z. fesflueZ *^tfD e QwX . , I j_ ., 4 ;f~ 4 ~ ~v7~ ' ~k " '« fl-r- . -FT -IfaTJLw tJUL/iA jMjiaeMA r^A^H, Cu/M\Df^A te$4 ~c 'u

Q*k fowtedoft* A^iici^tJLiyiyiAlsiMJ.J (L jJMUA JLm^ TUaj Z.U ? — /d^^/Kj^^Lcg/tJ^ /4

JLSUJ-V>J ^-i^L^Xt^^ JU^v^JJa^XJC \AJ0JU (KJ^JLoLZm jl/WjJty rj^JU &uX 'fr^o l^^lXjbjy^yy O^Mm(^^ iJL XtJu/UuL; Jb^M^J^ d^1M-CJU(rftfffi^ h 00 JVUCA'^ (j^AJ^ jj*

Ha, t/LLb tuddj U-^jL (flAy, DMV^Xi 7^1 dtJb&^a &4 j^^^Aw^

<** Q^k^^ BiUoit at $4>h $*>

JC

(jAMJ^^a^ www

Q •"I- •r-i

•r-J

o

^3-

t ^P sfc