Miguel Diaz v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 3, 2022·No. 13-21-00448-CR·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-21-00448-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

MIGUEL DIAZ, Appellant, v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria

Appellant filed a notice of appeal attempting to appeal convictions of aggravated robbery and aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Sentence in this matter was imposed with a judgment of conviction entered on October 21, 2021. Upon review of the documents filed, the trial court has certified that

this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal” without permission of the Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). On December 16, 2021, the Court ordered appellant’s counsel to review the record and determine whether appellant had a right to appeal. In response, appellant’s counsel filed a memorandum advising the Court of no right to appeal.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

NORA L. LONGORIA

Justice

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the 3rd day of February, 2022.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miguel Diaz v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Miguel Diaz v. the State of Texas (Miguel Diaz v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.