Miguel C. Chavez v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: June 6, 2017
• Docket: 01-16-00860-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION Cause number: 01-16-00860-CR Style: Miguel C. Chavez v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: May 31, 2017 Type of motion: Unopposed Third Motion for Thirty (30) Day Extension of Time to File Appellate Brief Party filing motion: Appellant’s counsel Thomas A. Martin Document to be filed: Appellant’s Brief

Is appeal accelerated? No.

If motion to extend time: Original due date: March 2, 2017 Number of extensions granted: 2 Current Due Date: May 31, 2017 Date Requested: June 30, 2017 (120 days from original due date)

Ordered that motion is:  Granted If document is to be filed, document due: June 30, 2017.  No further extensions of time will be granted.  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ On April 17, 2017, the Clerk of this Court granted appellant’s second extension, but warned counsel that no further extensions would be granted. Because appellant’s counsel’s request is unopposed and he states that, among other things, he has been out ill for several days and is a solo practitioner, his third extension is granted, but counsel is warned that no further extensions will be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.5(b)(1)(C), 38.6(d). Accordingly, if appellant’s brief is not filed by June 30, 2017, the Court will abate this case for a late-brief hearing. See id. 38.8(b)(2).

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley  Date: June 6, 2017

November 7, 2008 Revision