Miguel Aguilar, Jr. v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 19, 2016
Docket04-16-00508-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Miguel Aguilar, Jr. v. State (Miguel Aguilar, Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miguel Aguilar, Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

September 19, 2016

No. 04-16-00508-CR

Miguel AGUILAR, Jr., Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014CRS1753 D4 Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding

ORDER

Miguel Aguilar Jr. filed a timely notice of appeal from the judgments of conviction against him for one count of continuous sexual abuse of a child and three counts of indecency with a child. The trial court signed and filed a certification of Aguilar’s right of appeal that states, this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a) (2) (requiring trial court to enter a certification of the defendant’s right of appeal in every case in which it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). However, we are first obligated to review the record to ascertain whether the certification is defective. Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). A certification is “defective” if it “proves to be inaccurate” “when compared with the record.” Id. at 614.

The clerk’s record has been filed. It reflects that Aguilar pled not guilty to all four counts, he was found guilty by a jury after a trial, and the trial court imposed punishment. The record does not contain a plea bargain and the judgments affirmatively state that Aguilar was found guilty after a trial by jury. It thus appears that the certification is inaccurate when compared to the record and is defective. We therefore abate this appeal and order:

(1) the trial court to review the record and prepare an amended certification of the defendant’s right of appeal that comports with the record by September 29, 2016;

(2) the trial court to rule on appellant’s motion for a free record by September 29, 2016; and

(3) the trial court clerk to file a supplemental record by October 4, 2016 containing the amended certification and the trial court’s order on the motion for a free record.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 19th day of September, 2016.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Miguel Aguilar, Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miguel-aguilar-jr-v-state-texapp-2016.