Mignone v. Troutman
224 S.W.3d 670, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 826, 2007 WL 1598601
Opinion
Order
Ian Troutman appeals the trial court’s judgment following a jury verdict in favor of Janet Mignone. Troutman argues that because of juror misconduct, a new trial should be granted. Troutman further alleges that the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on comparative fault. We hold that there was no juror misconduct and that the second argument has not been preserved for appeal.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mignone v. Troutman, 224 S.W.3d 670, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 826, 2007 WL 1598601 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).
224 S.W.3d 670 (Mignone v. Troutman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nichols v. State
224 S.W.3d 670 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)