Mignery v. Olmstead

Ohio Supreme Court

Mignery v. Olmstead

91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 416

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 26, 1915·No. No. 14196·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed.

See journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed; this court being of the opinion that while the trial court erred in the admission of the testimony of the heirs of the decedent yet this testimony was not prejudicial for the reason that plaintiff in error having selected his remedy when he prepared and presented his claim against the estate of James Mignery, deceased, he could not maintain an action upon the instrument in question for the land.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed.

See journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed; this court being of the opinion that while the trial court erred in the admission of the testimony of the heirs of the decedent yet this testimony was not prejudicial for the reason that plaintiff in error having selected his remedy when he prepared and presented his claim against the estate of James Mignery, deceased, he could not maintain an action upon the instrument in question for the land.

Nichols, C. J., Johnson, Donahue, Wanamaker, Newman, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.

Mignery v. Olmstead, 91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 416 (Ohio 1915).

Pincite

91 Ohio St. (N.S.) 416 (Mignery v. Olmstead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.