Mignano v. United States
This text of 143 F. App'x 398 (Mignano v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.
In 1996, petitioner, a lawful permanent resident of the United States, pleaded guilty to participating in an illegal firearms dealing operation in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(1)(A). He was sentenced principally to four years of probation. After completing his sentence, petitioner faced deportation as an aggravated felon and a purveyor of unlawful weapons, see 8 U.S.C. §§ 1227(a)(2) (A) (in), (a)(2)(C), and he sought a writ of error coram nobis to vacate his conviction. The District Court denied the petition on November 4, 2004. On appeal, petitioner contends that the District Court erred in concluding that the petition was untimely and that it did not demonstrate sufficient compelling circumstances to warrant its granting.1
Having considered the submissions of the parties and heard oral argument, we conclude, for substantially the reasons set forth by the District Court in its thoughtful opinion dated November 4, 2004, see [399]*399J.A. 112-125, that denial of the petition was proper. Accordingly, the order of the District Court is hereby AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
143 F. App'x 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mignano-v-united-states-ca2-2005.