Mignano v. McAndrews

56 F. 300, 4 C.C.A. 4, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1528
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMay 19, 1892
StatusPublished

This text of 56 F. 300 (Mignano v. McAndrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mignano v. McAndrews, 56 F. 300, 4 C.C.A. 4, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1528 (2d Cir. 1892).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon further consideration of the application made in this cause to direct the district court to pay to the libelants the moneys deposited as a tender by the respondents in the registry of that court, we have concluded that we have uo authority to interfere. The only power of this court over the cause is by virtue of its statutory authority to review and determine the cause, and, of course, to make all orders incidentally necessary for that purpose. As this court does not execute its own decrees, (section 10, Court of Appeals Act,) the funds upon an appeal from the district court; in an admiralty cause remain in the district court. This court has no control over them, or over the district court in respect to them, except when the cause is reviewed and determined and remanded for further proceedings, in pursuance of the determination.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 F. 300, 4 C.C.A. 4, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mignano-v-mcandrews-ca2-1892.