Migliozzi v. Lee Memorial Health System

District Court, M.D. Florida·Decided May 7, 2020·No. 2:20-cv-00326·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

ISABELLA MIGLIOZZI,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 2:20-cv-326-FtM-38MRM

LEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM, THE PAVILION AT HEALTHPARK, LLC and JOHN DOE,

Defendants. / ORDER1 Before the Court is Plaintiff Isabella Migliozzi’s Complaint filed on May 5, 2020. (Doc. 1). A federal judge must “disqualify [her]self in any proceeding in which [her] impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” 28 U.S.C. § 455(a). Any doubt “must be resolved in favor of recusal.” Id. The purpose of § 455 is “to promote confidence in the judiciary by avoiding even the appearance of impropriety whenever possible.” Liljeberg v. Health Servs. Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847, 865 (1988); see also United States v. Cerceda, 188 F.3d 1291, 1293 (11th Cir. 1999) (requiring recusal when the objective circumstances create an appearing of partiality). Recusal is appropriate when “an objective, disinterested, lay observer fully informed of the facts underlying the grounds on which recusal was sought would entertain a significant doubt about the judge’s impartiality.” Parker v. Connors Steel Co., 855 F.2d 1510, 1524 (11th Cir. 1988). Any

1 Disclaimer: Documents hyperlinked to CM/ECF are subject to PACER fees. By using hyperlinks, the Court does not endorse, recommend, approve, or guarantee any third parties or the services or products they provide, nor does it have any agreements with them. The Court is also not responsible for a hyperlink’s availability and functionality, and a failed hyperlink does not affect this Order. doubts must resolve in favor of the moving party. See Murray v. Scott, 253 F.3d 1308, 1310 (11th Cir. 2001). Because a member of the Undersigned’s immediate family works for one of the named Defendants, there is a conflict of interest. So, to avoid even the appearance of partiality (or impartiality), the Undersigned must recuse from this case. Accordingly, it is now ORDERED: (1) The Honorable Sheri Polster Chappell is RECUSED from the above-captioned case. (2) The Clerk of the Court is directed to REASSIGN the case to another United States District Judge. DONE and ORDERED in Fort Myers, Florida on this 7th day of May 2020.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copies: All Parties of Record

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Migliozzi v. Lee Memorial Health System, (M.D. Fla. 2020).

Migliozzi v. Lee Memorial Health System (Migliozzi v. Lee Memorial Health System) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Cerceda
188 F.3d 1291 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)
Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.
486 U.S. 847 (Supreme Court, 1988)
Parker v. Connors Steel Co.
855 F.2d 1510 (Eleventh Circuit, 1988)