Migliaccio v. Union Carbide Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Migliaccio v. Union Carbide Corp.

413 P.2d 300, 17 Utah 2d 397, 1966 Utah LEXIS 492

CourtUtah Supreme Court

DecidedApril 21, 1966

DocketNo. 10458

StatusPublished

This text of 413 P.2d 300 (Migliaccio v. Union Carbide Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Migliaccio v. Union Carbide Corp., 413 P.2d 300, 17 Utah 2d 397, 1966 Utah LEXIS 492 (Utah 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

WADE, Justice.

Action to establish the location of agreed upon boundary lines between mining claims located in Emery County, Utah, wherein the metes and bounds descriptions were conceded to be incorrect. The trial court, after a long trial in which it carefully considered and studied the evidence presented, made findings of fact and conclusions of law and [398]*398entered judgment thereon in accordance with its views stated in its opinion.

Appellants contend there is no substantial evidence to sustain the trial court’s findings of fact as to the correct location of monuments on the ground.

We have carefully studied the views expressed by the trial court and the evidence presented on all sides of the case, and definitely find substantial evidence to support the trial court’s findings which requires us to affirm them. Costs to respondent.

HENRIOD, C. J., and McDONOUGH, CROCKETT, and CALLISTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WADE, Justice.

Action to establish the location of agreed upon boundary lines between mining claims located in Emery County, Utah, wherein the metes and bounds descriptions were conceded to be incorrect. The trial court, after a long trial in which it carefully considered and studied the evidence presented, made findings of fact and conclusions of law and [398]*398entered judgment thereon in accordance with its views stated in its opinion.

Appellants contend there is no substantial evidence to sustain the trial court’s findings of fact as to the correct location of monuments on the ground.

We have carefully studied the views expressed by the trial court and the evidence presented on all sides of the case, and definitely find substantial evidence to support the trial court’s findings which requires us to affirm them. Costs to respondent.

HENRIOD, C. J., and McDONOUGH, CROCKETT, and CALLISTER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

413 P.2d 300, 17 Utah 2d 397, 1966 Utah LEXIS 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/migliaccio-v-union-carbide-corp-utah-1966.