Migis v. AutoZone, Inc.
This text of 398 P.3d 360 (Migis v. AutoZone, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant, AutoZone, Inc., petitions for reconsideration of our decision, Migis v. AutoZone, Inc., 282 Or App 774, 387 P3d 381 (2016), concerning the disposition of its appeal. Defendant argues that concepts of waiver or invited error should preclude a new trial on the off-the-clock claim penalties and compel a defense verdict on that issue as a matter of law. We allow the petition for reconsideration to state that we reject those arguments. Without further discussion, we adhere to our original decision.
Reconsideration allowed; former disposition adhered to.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
398 P.3d 360, 286 Or. App. 357, 2017 WL 2664803, 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/migis-v-autozone-inc-orctapp-2017.