Migdal v. MNT Props., LLC

2022 NY Slip Op 04020
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 22, 2022
DocketIndex No. 7312/14
StatusPublished

This text of 2022 NY Slip Op 04020 (Migdal v. MNT Props., LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Migdal v. MNT Props., LLC, 2022 NY Slip Op 04020 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Migdal v MNT Props., LLC (2022 NY Slip Op 04020)
Migdal v MNT Props., LLC
2022 NY Slip Op 04020
Decided on June 22, 2022
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 22, 2022 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, J.P.
SHERI S. ROMAN
JOSEPH J. MALTESE
WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.

2020-04765
(Index No. 7312/14)

[*1]Misha Migdal, respondent,

v

MNT Properties, LLC, defendant, Freeman Howard, P.C., appellant.


Freeman Howard, P.C., Hudson, NY (Paul M. Freeman of counsel), appellant pro se.

Brian P. Hickey, Jr., P.C., Huntington, NY, for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant Freeman Howard, P.C., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Roy S. Mahon, J.), entered February 26, 2020. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of that defendant pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1) and (7) to dismiss the seventh and eighth causes of action asserted against it.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, and so much of the order as denied the motion of the defendant Freeman Howard, P.C., pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1) and (7) to dismiss the seventh and eighth causes of action asserted against it is vacated.

In light of our determination on a related appeal (see Migdal v Freeman Howard, P.C., ___ AD3d ___ [Appellate Division Docket Number 2019-00010; decided herewith]), we dismiss the appeal as academic.

DUFFY, J.P., ROMAN, MALTESE and FORD, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 3211
New York CVP § 3211(a)(1)
§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2022 NY Slip Op 04020, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/migdal-v-mnt-props-llc-nyappdiv-2022.