Miffin v. State

197 So. 3d 626, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11638, 2016 WL 4138096
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 3, 2016·No. No. 2D16-582·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Knight v. State, 808 So.2d 210 (Fla.2002); Ward v. State, 946 So.2d 33 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); Macaluso v. State, 912 So.2d 694 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Ives v. State, 993 So.2d 117 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008); Rangel v. State, 937 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006).

LaROSE, SLEET, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miffin v. State, 197 So. 3d 626, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 11638, 2016 WL 4138096 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

197 So. 3d 626 (Miffin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rangel v. State
937 So. 2d 1218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Ives v. State
993 So. 2d 117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Knight v. State
808 So. 2d 210 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
MacAluso v. State
912 So. 2d 694 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Ward v. State
946 So. 2d 33 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)