Miers v. Columbia Mut. Building & Loan Ass'n
This text of 114 F. 1022 (Miers v. Columbia Mut. Building & Loan Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
That this court has jurisdiction to marshal the assets and administer the estate of this insolvent corporation, when requi[1023]*1023site diversity of citizenship exists, is clear. Inasmuch as the answer admits ail the allegations of the complaint, and no opposition is suggested, save l'uom two stockholders, who have given notice of withdrawal, a decree will be entered in the usual form, appointing .John Hanson Kennard, Esq., and John J. Townsend, Esq., receivers oí the estate of defendant, with instructions to proceed to marshal the assets, pay the creditors, and ¡.Mlmiirfeiei’ the same. Intervention on the part of any stockholders seems unnecessary; but notice of the investigation and passing of receivers’ accounts must he given to all counsel who appeared on the hearing-. Arthur H. Basten, Esq., one of the standing masters of this court, is designated to take testimony and report as to any disputed claims, and as to said receivers’ accounts, when the same may be presented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
114 F. 1022, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miers-v-columbia-mut-building-loan-assn-circtsdny-1902.